There is heavy security presence at the University of Ghana on the first day of reopening for students.
The police officers have been deployed to prevent continuing students of the Commonwealth hall from entering their previous hall.
This comes on the back of a new residential policy arrangement by the university which directs the continuing students to occupy other accommodation facilities provided by the School.
Some students of the Commonwealth hall secured an interlocutory injunction on January 6, 2023, restraining the management of UG from implementing the residential policy decision.
But on Thursday, January 12, 2023, some continuing students arrived on campus to see a heavy security presence, preventing them from accessing the traditional hall.
Some students have secured an injunction against the policy but the management of UG argued that it implemented the decision before the injunction was secured.
Some of the students are stranded on campus with some not knowing where to place their luggage and others items.
“We came here and the school’s security said they will not allow us to enter [the halls], and the police are assisting them to do that,” one of the frustrated continuing students said.
The UG in a statement on January 11, 2023, indicated that about 83% of students who will not be allowed back into the traditional hall have agreed to other accommodation facilities provided by the university.
But another student furiously said, “that is not the truth, the reason is that the way they brought about the whole thing was like a threat. They said you accept or reject to become a non-resident. They pushed the whole thing to our throat, we were left with no choice. We want the whole world to know that the UG management is flouting the laws of Ghana. If it’s contempt of court it’s not for me to say, the court will prove itself in the coming days. The injunction says let the status quo remain, what management is doing so bad, the whole world and everybody must come against it”.
The UG on January 11, 2023, in a statement instructed its lawyers to vigorously fight the injunction, arguing that it was secured on inaccurate information by the supposed students.
